(410) 465-8777


Home
Concert Seasons
Guest Artists
Behind the Music
Directions
Competitions
About Us
Press Room
Sponsors
Links

Tickets
Shop AMAZON
Advertise
Donate
Volunteer
Mailing List
Contact Us

Auditions
For Members
Site Map


Click above to search

Behind the Music sublinks: Audio | Preludes | Program_Notes | Program_Notes_Archive | You_tube

Program Notes - Concert 3/27/10

by Bill Scanlan Murphy


ALBERTO GINASTERA (1916–1983)

MALAMBO from ESTANCIA, Op. 8
Composed: 1941
Premiered: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1943

Early in 1941, Aaron Copland was sent on a lengthy tour of South America as a wandering cultural ambassador, funded by the State Department (those were the days!). He met the fire-breathing Chavez in Mexico and the frighteningly prolific one-man musical tradition Villa-Lobos in Brazil; in Buenos Aires, after the Argentine premiere of his ballet Billy the Kid, he was presented with an alarmingly shy 25-year-old who, in a short time, impressed him more than the other two combined. This was Alberto Ginastera, a composer of daunting genius whose reputation is still making its way across the world. While undeniably—and proudly—an Argentine nationalist composer, Ginastera stands out as one of the few composers who would come to merge an open, accessible style with the formal and technical innovations of the post-Schoenberg era. Only Roberto Gerhard, the “12-note de Falla,” occupies anything resembling the same territory—and what a fascinating place it is.

Copland’s first response to hearing some of Ginastera’s music was to harangue Lincoln Kerstein, the director of the American Ballet Caravan who had commissioned Billy the Kid, into commissioning a work from Ginastera—“before someone else does.” Ginastera proposed a ballet based on the epic poem Martin Fierro by José Hernández: this would become, eventually, Estancia. “Eventually,” because Kerstein and his company went luridly bankrupt in 1942, taking the commission (and, alas for Ginastera, the choreographer George Balanchine), with them. By then, the music was almost complete. Ginastera, understandably incensed by being, as he saw it, stiffed, wrenched an orchestral suite from the score and had it performed, to near-hysterical acclaim, in 1943. His career, almost in spite of the Americanos, was launched. His friendship with Copland, incidentally, lasted until his death.

Billy the Kid is often referred to as a “cowboy ballet.” Estancia—a “Ballet in One Act and Five Scenes, based on Argentine country life”—is a gaucho ballet; more or less its direct Argentine equivalent (an estancia is a ranch). Unlike Copland’s work, however, Estancia, like the poem it is based on, is largely about the looming disappearance of the old gaucho way of life; there is an undeniable elegiac feeling at the edges of the sprawling, heroic musical landscapes of Estancia, as the twentieth century and urban sprawl (in 1940!) gnaw at an entire way of life. Like the characters in Lonely Are the Brave, the gauchos are magnificent, macho—and doomed.

The malambo is a ferocious, borderline violent, traditional gaucho dance that has been known to leave genuine casualties in its wake. Ginastera organizes his ballet in the shape of a single day, from dawn to dusk to new dawn, and the malambo becomes the Danza final, a final frenetic burst before life resets itself and the sun rises again. In that time, a gaucho girl has fallen in love with a city boy who proves himself with his horsemanship and gaucho skills—a Romeo and Juliet scenario that scarcely conceals the fact that the city boy represents not merely new blood for the traditional pampas, but its end.

Copland more or less single-handedly invented the music of the mythical West, and from that the music of the Western movie. From a similar starting point (the urbane Argentine was no more of a country boy than Copland), Ginastera conjures up more than a myth; he evokes the vast cultural and spiritual maelstrom that is Latin America.

Copland heard a few minutes of music in 1941, and knew he had met a genius. Now it’s our turn.


ANTONÍN DVORÁK (1841–1904)

POLEDNICE (THE NOON WITCH), Op. 108
Composed: 1896
Premiered: Prague, Czech Republic, 1896

How many symphonies did Dvorák write? The textbook answer is nine, but close examination of this symphonic poem reveals a fully-formed four-movement structure in miniature—introductory Allegro, slow movement, scherzo, and grand finale. The very essence of Romanticism lies in the realization that many great stories—even life itself—fall out in patterns astonishingly similar to the traditional forms of classical music. It is not difficult to describe anything from Hamlet to a football game in terms of sonata or tertiary form. A composer who writes a successful sonata is already telling a story; to tell another one —the “program”—all he has to do is attach labels to the various parts of his musical structure. Add a few coloristic elements and a careful dab of musical onomatopoeia (not so careful in Richard Strauss’s case, alas), and the result is the symphonic poem—movie music without the movie.

Dvorák was an enthusiastic admirer of the Czech nationalist poet Karel Erben—in his way, a Czech Hans Christian Andersen who turned folktales into universal fables. Dvorák wrote four symphonic poems based on Erben’s poems, of which The Noon Witch was the second. The story is grimly simple. A mother (Allegretto) tells her misbehaving son that the Noon Witch (a traditional demon hangover from pagan times like so many in European literature) will come for him if he does not mend his ways. He ignores her, and torments her with his toy cockerel (here, an oboe); the witch does indeed come (Andante sostenuto). However, his mother conceals him behind herself and confronts the witch, who terrifies the mother into a swoon (Allegro). When her husband returns in the evening (Andante), he finds that she has crushed the child to death herself.

What is this, if not a foreshadowing of the moral ambiguities and grim unintended consequences of Stephen Sondheim’s Into the Woods? Dvorák’s music—note the Bohemian folk tunes palmed off as Americanisms, the “Romantic” sweep concealing an iron classical structure—is never quite what it appears. There is an irony here that is usually overlooked—a fact that, as it emerges, only adds to our appreciation of this composer. He is even better than we already knew him to be.


CHARLES TOMLINSON GRIFFES (1884–1920)

POEM FOR FLUTE AND ORCHESTRA
Composed: 1918
Premiered: New York, 1918

Poor Charles Griffes lived only as long as Mozart, and was far less prolific—but what he left has proved enough to rank him among the greatest American composers. Despite its title, there is no real “poem” or program lurking behind this wonderful, rapturous, exotic music. Ironically, Griffes’ death was partly caused by exhaustion after sitting up night after night writing out parts for—among others—this work. He succumbed to the last wave of the post-World War One flu epidemic that killed more people than the War.


PYOTR ILLICH TCHAIKOVSKY (1840–1893)

VIOLIN CONCERTO in D Major, Op. 35

    3. Finale: Allegro vivacissimo
Composed: 1878
Premiered: Vienna, Austria, 1881

It is hard to imagine a work now as beloved as this concerto being badly received at its premiere, but the fact is that the soloist was booed off and the conductor was forced to scurry off the platform to avoid incoming coins. The august critic Eduard Hanslick described it as “music that stinks to the ear,” adding that the violin was “not so much played as beaten black and blue.” Brodsky told the composer that the work was “wonderfully beautiful,” but Tchaikovsky was so upset by Hanslick’s review that he could recite it from memory till the day he died.

In the hands of a soloist who can actually play it, the concerto is, indeed, very difficult, but it is the difficulty that reveals new possibilities for the instrument; the multiple stops and difficult stretches of the solo part became staple, if very advanced, features of the instrument’s technique.

The concerto’s finale is an uncompromisingly Russian dance—a Trepak. The composer once damned by arch-Nationalist Balakirev as “hopelessly un-Russian” thus goes out in a blaze of national glory. Hanslick even paid the finale an unintended compliment by describing it as giving off a “stench of Russianness.”

Nowadays, we are more inclined to think it reeks of genius—as does anyone who can play it.


JONATHAN LESHNOFF (born 1973)

RUSH
Composed: 2008
Premiered: Germantown, Tennessee, 2009

Born in New Jersey and now an associate professor of music at Towson University and composer-in-residence with the Baltimore Chamber Orchestra, Jonathan Leshnoff is rapidly becoming one of the most in-demand composers in the United States. Like that of many other composers of his generation, Leshnoff’s music is another milestone on the long march from avant-gardisme, with transparency and—above all—approachability both vital aspects of his style. With recordings of his work available on the mass-market Naxos label, he can even be said to be attaining genuine popularity with a mass audience, something almost unimaginable in a serious composer thirty years ago.

Part of this process, for Leshnoff as for others, has been the resurgence of that most eighteenth-century of figures, the private patron. One of Leshnoff’s is Jeremiah German, a retired economics professor, who commissioned him to write a series of short piano pieces—“Moments”—which he then asked the composer to knit into an orchestral piece. Rush was the result.

Everything in the piece grows out of the opening measure—a technique harking back to Walton and Sibelius—leading to a central clarinet solo, floated over the strings. A return of the frantic mood of the opening is only halted by—of all things—the harp before a final peroration.

Those who see the word “Moments” and whisper “Stockhausen” in sheer dread need not be afraid. While this is hardly the world of the Schubertian Moment Musical, it is far closer to that than it is to the Sage of Darmstadt. This is music for all, in a voice that speaks to everybody.


HENRYK WIENIAWSKI (1835–1880)

VIOLIN CONCERTO NO. 2 in D minor

    I: Allegro Moderato

Composed: 1862
Premiered: St. Petersburg, Russia, 1862

A violin virtuoso who more or less played himself to death, dying of exhaustion in Moscow at the early age of 45, Wieniawski composed mainly for himself, though the very popular second Concerto is dedicated to another great nineteenth-century virtuoso, Pablo Sarasate. The passages of rapid staccato notes that are found throughout his works were specifically designed for his own, highly controversial rigid-arm bow grip, which made the music relatively easy for him, but cost him dearly in severe neuralgia in his last years. Nowadays, a different technique is recommended to students!

The first movement reverses the trend set by Mendelssohn: instead of bringing the soloist in within seconds of the downbeat, Wieniawski reverts (ironically in such a romantic work) to the Classical model, and gives the violin a longish buildup to a relatively restrained dramatic entry, playing its own, technically alarming version of the first subject that has just been outlined by the orchestra. From there, it’s sonata business as usual, with the lyrical second subject—indeed, much of the movement—showing Wieniawski’s particular fondness for the lower reaches of the violin’s range.


MAURICE RAVEL (1875–1937)

Suite, MA MERE L’OIE (MOTHER GOOSE)
Composed: 1908-1910 (piano version); 1912 (final orchestral version)
Premiered: Paris, 1910 (piano duet); Paris, 1912 (ballet)

  1. Pavane de la belle au bois dormant (Pavane of the Sleeping Beauty)
  2. Petit poucet (Little Tom Thumb)
  3. Laideronnette, impératrice des pagodes (Little Ugly Girl, Empress of the Pagodas)
  4. Les entretiens de la belle et de la bête (Conversation of Beauty and the Beast)
  5. Le jardin féerique (The Fairy Garden)

Mother Goose began as a collection of piano duets, written for Mimi and Jean, the two would-be prodigy children of Ravel’s friend, the artist Cyprian Godebski. Alas, the music was too difficult for them, so the first performance was placed in the hands (literally) of Jeanne Leleu and Geneviève Durony, who were both nine. These must have been two formidable little girls, as the music is no easier than the rest of Ravel’s piano music. Interestingly, the solo piano version is not by Ravel at all; he commissioned the arrangement from one of his students. There are hints throughout the music that an orchestration was already in Ravel’s mind from the beginning; he was delighted to oblige—very quickly indeed—when the impresario Jacques Rouché asked him for a fairy-tale ballet in 1912.

The music is based on five fairy tales, three of them by Charles Perrault, the “French Grimm,” a favorite with Ravel since his own childhood.

Ravel included quotations from the original stories in the score, so the underlying program is easy to follow. The Sleeping Beauty’s Pavane is of that special Ravelian kind, unknown to any other musical tradition but his, and certainly nothing to do with the Elizabethan Pavan; like that other famous Ravel “pavane,” the one for the dead Infanta, it lives in its own world of half-dreamed elegance.

In Tom Thumb, the birds who ruin Tom’s (or rather, the oboe’s) entire day by eating the breadcrumbs he has laid as a trail to get him out of the woods are portrayed by the same woodwind figures and string harmonics that raise the dawn in Daphnis et Chloé.

Conversations of Beauty and the Beast includes another of Ravel’s musical gestures that has become a staple of Hollywood—the combined harp glissando and triangle “ting”—as Beauty accepts the Beast’s hand in marriage, turning him instantaneously into a handsome prince.

In 1889, the 14-year-old Ravel visited the Paris Exhibition, where he saw a Javanese gamelan ensemble making a sound that would come to fascinate composers as diverse as Benjamin Britten, Olivier Messiaen, and (especially) Colin McPhee. That day, however, more eyes were drawn to the extremely rude young music student who berated the performers every time they stopped playing—Claude Debussy. Ravel looks back on this with the gentle pentatonic tinklings for the Princess of the Pagodas—who are not Chinese temples, but dwarves made of jewels. The Princess is a European royal child who has been transformed into a laideronette—an ugly little girl—by a witch. She meets a serpent, himself the bewitched King of the Pagodas, who retains his true form and marries her. This strange little story, redolent of the weirdest possible Jungian symbols, was drastically reworked as a ballet, The Prince of the Pagodas, by Benjamin Britten in 1957.

The Fairy Garden brings us another archetype—the Good Fairy, who applies the happily-ever-after formula to the future Prince and Princess Charming. Note the trademark long Ravel crescendo, which appears in one form or another from his earliest works to its apotheosis in Boléro.

The Columbia Orchestra
Phone: (410) 465-8777                 Howard County Center for the Arts                 Fax: (410) 465-8778
8510 High Ridge Road, Ellicott City, MD 21043


All written content © 1999-2009 The Columbia Orchestra. Contact web@columbiaorchestra.org for web page problems.